Home › PureVPN vs CyberGhost

PureVPN vs CyberGhost: Which Should You Choose in 2026?

A side-by-side on price, devices, servers and jurisdiction – grounded in PureVPN's own pricing page and 184 real reviews.

PureVPNCyberGhost
Price$2.15–$12.95/mo$2.19–$12.99/mo
Simultaneous devices10 (+Multi-Login add-on)7
Free planNo free plan (31-day money-back guarantee) – (45-day guarantee)
Servers / locations6,000+ servers / 80+ locations, 65+ countries10,000+ servers / 100+ countries
JurisdictionBritish Virgin IslandsRomania

Pricing

CyberGhost's discounted rate runs about $2.19/mo on its 26-month plan (24 months + 2 free), close to PureVPN's Standard price, rising to a higher month-to-month rate. No free plan, but a 45-day money-back guarantee on long-term plans – longer than PureVPN's 31 days.

Features & network

CyberGhost claims an even larger network – 10,000+ servers across 100+ countries – and caps devices at 7 simultaneous connections, three fewer than PureVPN's 10. Both companies bundle broadly similar extras (streaming-optimized servers, ad blocking).

Which should you choose?

CyberGhost's longer refund window is a real edge if you're unsure about committing; PureVPN's 10-device limit beats CyberGhost's 7 if you need to cover more devices on one account.

What PureVPN's own reviewers say

Good Value for Money

Some long-term users believe PureVPN offers good value, especially when taking advantage of special offers. They find the service reliable and cost-effective compared to other VPNs.

Ineffective for Specific Use Cases

Some users find PureVPN ineffective for specific purposes, such as accessing certain streaming services or bypassing regional restrictions. This has led to frustration among those with specific needs.

These are patterns from our analysis of all 184 PureVPN reviews, not CyberGhost-specific complaints – useful context on what you'd actually be trading for a lower price or a larger network.

Try PureVPN

Measured head-to-head: PureVPN vs CyberGhost

Our own captures for PureVPN and CyberGhost, side by side, with every gap and every limit.

MeasuredPureVPNCyberGhost
Baseline download (VPN off)293 Mbps295 Mbps
Nearest Europe: serverFrankfurtStrasbourg
Nearest Europe: download200 Mbps (68%)194 Mbps (66%)
Nearest Europe: upload170 Mbps157 Mbps
Nearest Europe: ping39 ms42 ms
Long-distance US: download209 Mbps (71%)210 Mbps (71%)
Long-distance US: ping177 ms126 ms
DNS leak test captured captured
WebRTC leak test captured captured
BBC iPlayer captured captured
Netflixnot capturednot captured

Takeaway: on the Europe route PureVPN kept 68% of its baseline against 66% for CyberGhost (a gap of 2 points); on the US route 71% against 71%. Gaps this small are inside the noise of a single run, so we do not call a winner on speed.

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each VPN. Server country and protocol can differ; one run per route.

All PureVPN captures →

Questions people ask

Short answers, based on our own captures and the data on this site.

Which is faster, PureVPN or CyberGhost?

On the nearest-European route PureVPN delivered 200 Mbps against CyberGhost's 194 Mbps (68% vs 66% of each baseline); on the US route 209 vs 210 Mbps. One run each, so treat small gaps as noise.

Is PureVPN or CyberGhost better for streaming?

We captured PureVPN playing BBC iPlayer. For CyberGhost we captured BBC iPlayer. Missing results mean not captured, not failed.

Were both tested under the same conditions?

Same line and machine with a fresh baseline for each, but the server country and protocol can differ; the table lists them.

Where can I see the raw captures?

The screenshots and recordings for PureVPN are on its tests pages. We publish captures only for the VPN each site is about.